Dad & Fiancée Exclude His Daughter from Their Wedding after She Bought a Dress & Shoes for It

In a surprising twist, a young girl discovers that her father and his fiancée have chosen to exclude her from their wedding. The reasons behind their shocking decision remained a tantalizing mystery, forcing him to uncover the truth.

On August 15, 2023, an anonymous teenager took to Reddit’s “AITA” forum to share her story. Despite having a stronger bond with her mother, she was always very close to her father. They typically spent time together three to four times a week.

Several years ago, her father started dating “Anna.” She and the girl still got on remarkably well. When her father finally proposed to Anna, the young girl felt truly elated, as she seemed like the ideal stepmother.

However, a few weeks before the wedding, when the girl had already invested in everything necessary for the event, including her dress and shoes, her father and Anna approached her to discuss something important.

Having been close to her father for as long as she could remember, the young girl was shocked when he and her future mother-in-law suddenly expressed the need to “talk.”

What happened?
Anna and the girl’s father had made an unexpected decision regarding their wedding: it would be a childless event, a choice that the girl understood, especially for younger people. However, it turned out that “childfree” meant excluding anyone under 18, including her.

The situation hit the girl hard, as her 18th birthday was just two days after the wedding date. Despite this closeness, she found herself prohibited from attending the wedding. It was a bitter pill to swallow, knowing that she would be officially an adult in just a few days.

The marriage took place on August 12; His 18th birthday followed two days later. During this time, she had no communication with Anna or her father, who told her she couldn’t attend because she wasn’t an adult yet. In the midst of her frustration, her mother decided to take her on vacation for her birthday, and on her birthday, she posted photos on Facebook, declaring, “[Finally], an adult.” »

The girl was grateful that her father and Anna hadn’t included her in their marriage since she was under 18. However, after posting birthday photos on social media, the teenager said she felt more mature and confident.

The post sparked a storm of reactions from friends and family, who questioned her father and Anna’s decision and expressed their outrage on her behalf. In response to the backlash, the girl received a barrage of texts from her father and Anna, calling her immature and a selfish brat. They argued that her actions only demonstrated her immaturity and justified their decision to exclude her.

Conflicted and searching for perspective, the girl discussed the situation with her friends, some of whom suggested that she may have been wrong in her actions, advising her to let it go.

Now, the girl has turned to the Reddit community, asking their opinion on whether she was right or wrong to publicly express her feelings and celebrate her 18th birthday despite being excluded from her father and Anna’s wedding.

What are people thinking?
The teen’s Reddit post generated an overwhelming response from Redditors, with the majority expressing their support for her. One user felt that the teenager was not wrong, saying it was unusual for a father not to have his own child at his wedding.

They added that since her father and Anna made this choice, they should have no problem with it being made public. Additionally, they pointed out that clarifying the reason for his absence could preserve his reputation, as some might have assumed that his absence resulted from disapproval or preference for the vacation.

Another commenter shared a similar view, emphasizing that the decision to exclude the groom’s daughter, aged 17 years and 363 days, from a supposedly childless marriage was a deliberate choice aimed at excluding her, not only about marriage but also about their lives.

In a separate response, a Reddit user agreed with this sentiment, saying the rule was absurd and seemed designed to specifically exclude the teen. They suggested that he communicate his new awareness of his father’s priorities, indicating that he seemed to prioritize his new wife’s wishes over his relationship with her.

They also advised him to take proactive measures to protect himself from future hurtful situations.

Like this post? Please share to your friends: